Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Related to Antibiotic Dispensing and Resistance among Community Pharmacists in South India

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics are chemical agents that either kill bacteria or inhibit their growth. An antibiotic drug is a synthesized medicine used to treat bacterial infections.^[1] The phrase “antimicrobial” refers to a large category of medications used to treat diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, including those that treat malaria.^[1] Antibiotic resistance refers to genetic changes in bacteria that diminish or eliminate the effectiveness of an antibiotic in destroying them.^[2]

To stop the development and propagation of antimicrobial resistance, the World Health Organization is coordinating a worldwide initiative to educate the public, legislators, and professionals in the fields of agriculture and health about optimal practices.^[3] Drug-resistant bacteria are accelerated by illicit drug use, overuse, and insufficient infection mitigation and management.^[2] Particularly in the past century, reports of the worldwide spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, robust isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and resistant Enterobacteriaceae-particularly strains resistant to cephalosporins because they produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenems – have drawn significant attention to the issue of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.^[4]

One of the biggest concerns to public health in the 21^st century is bacterial antibiotic resistance, which happens when alterations in bacteria make medications intended for healing infection less potent.^[5] Understanding the public’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) around antibiotic usage is critical to determining any training prerequisites and to help minimize the overuse and misuse of antibiotics. The public can play a significant role in this respect.^[6] Community drugstore pharmacists typically give antibiotics despite the absence of a doctor’s prescription because people cannot pay appointment charges.^[7]

Resistance arises due to selective pressure on microbial communities, which leads to the selection of resistant strains.^[8] Overuse of antibiotics bought from community drug stores without a prescription, particularly in developing nations, has been documented in certain studies.^[9] As widespread, long-standing diseases coexist with newly emerging, drug-resistant microbes, there is a rapidly narrowing period of opportunity; taking no action now will result in no solution in the future.^[10] Due to decades of misapplication and overuse of antibiotics, clinically important bacteria now exhibit resistance to numerous antibiotics and resistance to a single medication.^[11]

MATERIAL AND METHODS

First, a longitudinal research study was conducted to evaluate pharmacy technicians in South India’s KAP regarding dispensing antibiotics and resistance. The Institutional Review Board granted consent for the research (RIPER/IRB/PP/2022/011). The study was conducted in various communities across South India. This study took place from March 2023 to August 2023, spanning a period of 6 months. A total of 200 community pharmacists were included as participants in this study. Those who were not community pharmacists or who would not agree to participate in the poll were excluded from the study. A Google Forms-distributed online survey questionnaire was used to gather data. Respondents were sent a link to a Google Form as part of the study methodology. Before accessing the digital poll, respondents had to indicate their interest in participating by selecting “yes” on platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp.

RESULTS

The research project was carried out in South India during 6 months. The study involved a total of 200 participants. Out of the 200 participants, 112 were male and 88 were female. The majority of participants (172) among the 200 respondents were aged 20–29 years, 21 participants were aged 30–39, and 7 participants were aged 40–49. The majority of the participants (178) had <5 years [Table 1] of experience, 18 had 5-9 years and 4 had 10 or more than 10 years.

Table 2 describes the community pharmacist’s understanding of the uses and side effects of antibiotics. Antibiotics are used to treat bacterial illnesses, according to 50% of pharmacists. Antibiotics are helpful for viral infections, according to 52%of respondents. Merely 11% strongly disagree that antibiotics have been demonstrated to alleviate pain and inflammation. About 54% concurred that antibiotics might eradicate the typical variety of bacteria in the intestines. Merely 7% concurred that antibiotics could result in a relapse with infection after eliminating the healthy bacteria in the gut. A mere 8% enthusiastically agreed that an adverse reaction could result from antibiotic use. When asked if taking antibiotics can be stopped before finishing an entire course of treatment if symptoms improve, 37% of the respondents thought that improperly using drugs can cause an antibiotic’s sensitivity to a particular infection to decline. Among pharmacists, 28% were opposed to this observation.

Table 3 shows the pharmaceutical professionals’ perspective on antimicrobial resistance. Sixty per cent of respondents felt that antimicrobial resistance had grown to be a serious health concern. The prescription medicine distribution is at risk: 61% concurred. Most people responded neutrally in strong, non-prescriptive terms. Awareness of antibiotic resistance: 60% agreed. Need for adequate training on antimicrobial use: 53% agreed. Antimicrobials have minimal impact: 58% agreed. Just 13% disagreed that doctors who write prescriptions are the only professionals in their line of work. About 54% concurred to playing a significant part in health initiatives that address the prevention of infections and the use of resistant antimicrobial agents.

Table 4 describes the pharmacy technicians’ answers to the questions meant to evaluate how they dispense antibiotics. “I give antibiotics without a written authorization because I am aware that 22% of the patients did not oppose it. About 19% of patients firmly insisted that I dispense antibiotics for longer than the physician had recommended. About 53% of respondents agreed that I prescribe antibiotics. I check the prescribed antibiotics: 52% agreed. I request additional clinical info prior administering: 47% of respondents concurred. I dispense more antibiotics than prescribed:35% agreed. I participate in antimicrobial awareness campaigns:50% agreed. I educate the patient about anti-microbial resistance: 54% agreed.

Table 5 illustrates the relationship between the KAP of community pharmacy technicians. The relationship between attitude and knowledge was positively correlated. There was a negative association between knowledge and practice and attitude and practice (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

The primary purpose of the research was to assess community pharmacists in South India’s KAP regarding antibiotic prescription and antimicrobial resistance. The findings provided insights into the KAP of community pharmacists in South India concerning antibiotic dispensing and resistance. Findings indicate a significant proportion of pharmacists have inadequate knowledge about antibiotics and their appropriate use.

About 52% of the respondents in our survey felt that antibiotics are helpful for infections with viruses, exposing a misperception that calls for focused education campaigns [Table 2]. On the other hand, more than two-thirds (70.5%) of 200 community pharmacy technicians in a research done by Hadi et al.^[2] were ignorant that it is against the law to dispense antibiotics without a doctor’s prescription. The number of antibiotics prescribed and teaching patients the significance of sticking to and finishing the entire course of antibiotics were found to be correlated (P = 0.007) in this research.

In addition, our study revealed that 37% of pharmacists acknowledged the potential consequences of antibiotic misuse on sensitivity to specific pathogens, emphasizing the importance of raising awareness about completing full courses of treatment.

The attitude of pharmacists toward antibiotic resistance emerged as a significant concern in our study. While 60% concurred that the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance is detrimental to health [Table 3], there remains room for improvement in terms of providing adequate training on anti-microbial use (53% agreed).There is a limited understanding of the impact of antimicrobial agents (58% agreed). Moreover, our study found that 54% of pharmacists are willing to play a significant part in programs that address the prevention of infection and resistant antimicrobial agents, indicating a positive inclination toward actively addressing these critical issues. These findings are consistent with a study conducted by J. Taibah Univ,^[13], which reported that some drugstore employees acknowledged giving out medicines without a written order. Pharmacists were more inclined to give antibiotics to patients who had already been prescribed the same medication (their frequent clients or families). However, most pharmacists did not perceive this practice as problematic for the patient’s welfare.

The assessment of pharmacist’s dispensing practices [Table 4] revealed some areas of concern, with 35% admitting to dispensing antibiotics beyond the prescribed duration. However, it is encouraging that 57% of pharmacists reported taking measures to prevent infection transmission and 54% educated patients about antimicrobial resistance. These findings indicate a willingness among pharmacists to promote responsible antibiotic dispensing practices and patient education.

In our investigation, we observed significant positive correlations between variables such as knowledge and attitude (P = 0.419), knowledge and practice (P = 0.416), and a negative correlation between attitude and practice (P = 0.399). These results are different from the research findings obtained by Gajdacs et al.,^[14] which found that Hungarian pharmacists are aware of the effects of rising antimicrobial resistance on the community and have a sufficient understanding of antibiotics and antimicrobial regimens.

The results of our study regarding the correlations between KAP were P < 0.05, indicating statistical significance. Antibiotic distribution methods and usage could be substantially improved by educational strategies and interventions to resolve recognized inadequacies, change mindsets, and minimize resistance.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates community pharmacists’ knowledge of antibiotic dispensing and resistance, highlighting their strong points and areas requiring development. While false beliefs and inadequate procedure exist, there is also a willingness among pharmacists to engage in initiatives aimed at addressing antibiotic resistance. The results highlight the significance of focused educational initiatives to dispel myths, promote responsible antibiotic dispensing practices, and bolster the pharmacist’s role in combating antibiotic resistance. Collaborative efforts involving healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies, and educational institutions are crucial to achieving these objectives.